Lately I have been battling with a particular thought process which seems to be gaining steam. If anyone has watched the news lately they have likely heard a story or two about Crown Prosecutors in Ontario doing extensive background checks into potential jurors. A professor who is also an investigative journalist warning about the harms of too much information online and a mass of other stories about what people put online, and who can see it. The warnings are all around and should be well heeded but where is that line between an employerâ€™s right to know and an employeeâ€™s privacy. At what point should you be saying â€œNo, that has nothing to do with my employment hereâ€.
A lot of people tends to blog in their personal website, although just few of them uses SEO techniques to increase their traffic, visit this link if you want to learn more about SEO.
In casual talks with employers and managers around the city the predominate feeling is that if an employee or potential employee has a blog, facebook, twitter stream, or any other online presence the it is the employers right to know. While no one would admit to actively hunting these resources out the reactions did indicate a certain â€œright to knowâ€ attitude. The reality is that some employers are doing extensive searches of current and potential employees online habits. A recent Deloitte survey found that 30% of employers were informally monitoring social networking sites for employeeâ€™s habits. People have even been dismissed for content they have posted online. A quick search for â€œFired for bloggingâ€ will give you an easy dozen links to choose for with related stories.
Now on the flip side many employees will argue that their online actions are none of their employers business. According to the same Deloitte survey 53% of employees think that their social networking habits are none of their employers business. Even though over 70% understand it is easy to damage their employerâ€™s reputation online. I think the reasons for this is quite obvious and do not warrant an in-depth discussion. Employees do not want to be held accountable at their employment for things they do off the company time. The basic social contract of mutual financial success, that is I perform a set of duties to assist the company in being profitable and am justly paid for those services, is the underlying principal of this. For many people the employee/employer relationship ends there and unless the employees external actions prevent or inhibit that process, what the employee does is their business.
So where do you stand? Where does the employee/employer relationship end? At what point do you feel the employer is overstepping its bounds of intruding into your personal life? Leave your comments below. I would love to hear from employers and employees alike on this.